The Concept of Modesty

This has to be one of the most controversial issues and has been the talk of many apologists, opportunists and journalists for some time. What do we do about these coverings? Are these women oppressed and subjugated or pious and holy? On this topic I will give my opinion on the matter based on my own personal experiences. Now I used to be someone that adored the hijab. It made me feel holy, special and closer to God. I thought it took away men’s ‘lustful’ gazes (in reality I was just flattering myself) and spoke something about my character. I even had the idiotic notion that such a covering protected me from rape (I will do an article on this issue as rape has absolutely nothing to do with what you are wearing).

My faith went so far as to encourage me to almost start donning the niqab, in an effort to display my piety. Sadly, it took me four years to realize I had deluded myself into believing that this was ‘modesty’, but it was based on the teachings that sexually repressed men dictated. So where to start? Modesty. What is modesty? The dictionary gives its definition as “something to prevent the over-exposure of a particular part of the body or the condition of being modest”. The definition is pretty straight forward.

In this day and age, the hijab/niqab/burka does NOT represent modesty in any sense of the word. What it is, at least as far as the hijab is concerned, is a religious “tradition” that has been around throughout time. (I will post an article on that notion at the end of the blog.) While there is nothing wrong with wearing a head covering, it does not symbolize modesty, but rather humility before God and God alone. What these hijabi fanatics have done is try to make it mandatory for every Muslim woman and even more in such extreme cases where the Burka and Niqab come along.

Well let’s look at what the Quran says:
24:31 And say to the believing women that they should lower their gaze and guard their modesty (The arabic wording is actually vagina not modesty) ; that they should not display their beauty and ornaments except what appear thereof; that they should draw their veils over their bosoms and not display their beauty except to their husbands, their fathers, their husband's fathers, their sons, their husbands' sons, their brothers or their brothers' sons, or their sisters' sons, or their women, or the slaves whom their right hands possess, or male servants free of physical needs, or small children who have no sense of the shame of sex; and that they should not strike their feet in order to draw attention to their hidden ornaments. And O ye Believers! turn ye all together towards Allah, that ye may attain Bliss.

The Quran merely commands women to cover their “private parts”, to men who are not part of their family and yes, the verses above have the same orders for men too. Now the people of Bukhari’s sunna, claim that these sort of fanatical clothing should hide the woman’s body to the extent that she can hardly move about, is what Allah ordained. They have taken the concept of hijab and used it to mean only head covering.

If you study the Arabic language of the Quran, you will notice that the wording is very unanimous. The reason for this is that the Quran was obviously meant for all of humanity, until the end times and hence, it has the ability to be assimilated into all cultures. Now, in most translations, the Quran says to “cover your bosoms and hide your charms (vagina)”, nothing more, nothing less. So, if you study the Arabic culture of the pre-Islamic era, before the arrival of Prophet Muhammad, you will see that the pagan women of Mecca walked around half naked.

The commandment came to both men and women to merely cover their private parts or in other words, be civilized and respect their bodies and so the wording of the Quran is universal in order to work with cultures of all clothing styles. What you are seeing today is, for lack of a better word, Arabism. The excuse they use for their clothing, as well as prayer method, is that it shows Muslim unity. However they have taken oppression and “cloaked” it, under the guise of modesty. They have taken unity to remove individuality. The ONLY unity Muslims need to show and believe is the belief in God, doing righteous good deeds and to warn others as well as give glad tidings of the Lord.

That is the only unity. The hijab while being nothing I have much of a problem with,

is nothing more than humility before God and should be worn for God only, not because of man’s sexual weakness.

 For indeed the Quran has commanded men to practice self-restraint many times and does not blame women for the ‘beast that lies within.’ It is when these Muslims take it too far with their pride and arrogance, that the concept of hijab becomes oppression and even disrespected by their users, as in women wearing hijab, but dressing and acting in ways contrary to that of the righteous woman (yet preaching righteousness). There are many cases of families forcing their daughters to wear it and there are many other cases of Muslims harassing and humiliating women into wearing it. They all preach of how the Quran says there is no compulsion in religion, yet look at what they do with the rulings of even moderate contemporary scholars stating that, “women without hijab are in a state of sin”.

Unfortunately, a lot of the people of the sunna do not understand the concept of personal choice or they simply advise but don’t leave it to the individual to act on it or not. They pester and annoy them. I think I have made it clear that the Quran merely commanded women to dress tastefully so they are not insulted (harassed with unwanted attention) as there is a verse on this and the verse is universal so as to be cross-cultural so that women and men could live in civil respect for each other and their bodies. While the hijab is perfectly fine, it is merely an ancient tradition to show a woman’s piety before God and it is only fanatics that turn it into a burden. However, now I will explain with the more extreme coverings on why these things ARE oppression, regardless of the woman choosing to wear it or not.

Now I will talk about the Niqab and Burka as one and how this is a controlling device on how to silence women. Such a covering is not mentioned in the Quran, but stems from hadiths of the ‘sunna’ under the pretence that this is a woman’s ‘honour’ and ‘modesty.’ Now think about it. You don a covering that hides everything on your body so you can’t enjoy the breeze on your skin, have picnics at parks and in the burning heat you are wearing black all over. Especially for a woman living in a western country wearing this, you look out of place, scare people shitless as they either think you are a terrorist or the grim reaper and you are met with hatred and contempt.

Many women or at least the ones who choose to dress like this would say that this is their ‘Jihad’ for God. I say that this is them being snobbish idiots. When I posed these questions to Muslim males they say that these sorts of women have abrogated all worldly needs like having a picnic with their friends, (yet their husbands can go out and do it?) but it doesn’t appear so. I see them sitting in parks, at restaurants or just simply trying to enjoy an ice-cream with their children out in the open and I can tell you…even pigs have better table manners.

I look at them like they are a skit house for pure comedy. Not trying to be mean but that is what I feel and see. Others view them with pity, some with hate and their supporters…well I don’t know what niqab/burka supporters would be thinking at such a display… that perhaps the burka is a Jihad on trying to eat food without getting it all over your clothes and face? I am going to be honest here and I will give you my real opinion on the matter.

A few years ago when I was a girl, there was a documentary on television about these monks who had given up all worldly and carnal desires. They lived separated from society, away from women and in small humble abodes made of mud brick and their daily jobs were either being farmers or saying prayers to God. Don’t take my word for this but I believe they were also eunuchs. Now there was nothing wrong with that. They weren’t hurting anyone; they were living in peace and seemed quite contented with a holy impoverished life.

Similarly a woman who dons a burka or niqab is free to do the same. She is free to give up all worldly wants and live a life of spiritual holiness before God, but that is what it should be for. Only for God not because she is hiding her beauty from men. Who gives a shit what men think? Their problem. Anyway like with the hijab, it is when they take these things too far that it becomes a problem. Of course we have heard of the multitudes of women in Afghanistan forced into burkas as well as in other parts of the world, but I am going to focus on its place in the West.

Now if you are going to wear something like this in a place where such a covering is a foreign concept, you also need to respect the country’s rules. Currently I and many other people have no problem with a burka woman going about her business, but when identification needs to be done she needs to take it off. I have seen these women make such a fuss and kick up a storm when officials need to see their faces for identity purposes in court rooms, police interrogations, banks and airports. They need to realize on a professional level that men don’t spontaneously get erect and if they do in such a civilized society, they either hide it or are removed from the general population.

These women have nothing to fear and they need to stop flattering themselves. They are not a group of Helen of Troy’s nor will they launch a thousand ships or in this case a thousand horny men after themselves no matter how much they dream. Most of them or at least from what I have seen are plainly not that pretty (no one is)  so they don’t need to worry. Now I AM against the banning of the Burka even though I think the item of clothing is ridiculous, but yes it was an abuse on women’s rights and a multitude of other things. What people need to do is diversify out of it.

What I think would have been a better approach would have been making policies on places like a bank, a court room, an airport and for police to have permission to request these women to remove their veils for identification purposes and as law abiding citizens they must oblige or reap the consequences. Basically ban it from public institutions like France did. Other than that, if they decide to walk the streets like dementors from Azkaban shopping I can be game. They are public entertainment and it would be a shame for the western governments to revoke me of my right to laugh and point fingers at these Halloween entities.

Similarly I will make it clear that the niqab and burka have no Islamic basis and for those that think they do, they are encouraging women to wear it for the wrong reasons. These reasons are because men are weak and it is a woman’s fault for making them lustful. To the sunna…in the modern world this sort of reasoning is called misogyny and I will make it clear that women are NOT to blame for men’s carnal desires. As righteous believers men under any circumstances even with his naked wife is told to practice self-restraint, not transgress limits or go in excess of his religion. All clear?

By that same notion women who choose to wear the niqab/burka are deluding themselves in believing that this makes them modest or somehow holy when in reality everyone thinks they are either oppressed or idiots and indeed the women who choose to dress like this to ‘hide their beauty’ are oppressed because they are idiots. Secondly dressing like this makes it harder for the women who are forced into this item of clothing to voice her freedom and get out of such oppression such as in the case of the women of the Taliban. Thirdly these hadiths forbid women from going out, being able to talk in their normal voice (some say no talking at all) and even from walking too loudly all because of man’s lust. Like I said before, men are to control themselves. These people are also very sly and whip out the rights of the woman in the Quran while pretending all these hadith sanctions on women don’t exist and bellow about all the rights women have…until they convert. Just one of the many reasons why Bukhari’s sunna is not to be taken seriously.

A woman is also encouraged to stay in the home and because she has a vagina it means her only duty is to pop out as many babies as she can and cook and clean. None of this is commanded in the Quran. They have taken respectful obedience to the husband and changed it into subservience of the extreme kind. This is another topic that will come up in future blogs about the women of the so called ‘Islamic World.’

I think the last thing to add to this is that when the ‘modesty’ of the burka is challenged they whip out the whorish women of the West argument and I will make a few things clear. Anonymous statistics collected by NGO as well as living in these ‘Muslim’ countries have shown us that they are anything but ‘Modest’ and are worse than the west. I could name it in a hundred ways but in regards to sexual chastity, they are worse if not just as bad. Plenty of men and women have had sex before marriage, are adulterous, have had abortions, engage in extreme sex practices, and indulge in lesbianism and homosexuality among all the other violent things that happen within their societies. They are just ‘hush hush’ about it and pretend that the Sharia prevents all this. In reality they are no better. In my opinion they don’t even compare to the civilized western society.

So whipping out the argument that women of the west are whores is a null and void debate. On the contrary, many western women are good wives, devoted mothers, independent educated women with jobs and much more. The point is that those who do these sexual acts before marriage, both men and women don’t have a religion, are of a different religion or are just not practising religion. Furthermore the West gives these people the CHOICE on how to conduct their lives and what sexual preferences and styles they take. So long as it is nothing illegal and is consensual than it is really no one’s business.

Just in this topic many other issues are brought into light which I will talk about in future updates, but it is clear that the burka and niqab serve no Islamic basis, is an oppressive item of clothing no matter how much women delude themselves and is degrading to women. Many would say that women who wear almost nothing are oppressed, but that’s the thing-they choose to dress like that not caring about idiotic male ding dongs. Most burka women on the other hand are either forced to wear it or out of delusion wear it for the wrong reasons! (Personally even just wearing it for God isn’t a ‘right’ reason because no texts say it is)

What I am trying to say here is that if you do choose to wear such a garment, don’t do it in the west, comply with identification laws where necessary and if not go to a country where it is permissible to wear it if you want that sort of life. But it is not Islamic or freedom in any sense of the word. It is Arabism, it is oppression-a wolf in sheep’s clothing (modesty) and it looks RIDICULOUS. And most important of all it is not something to be proud of or endorse.  ( 

 http://www.submission.org/dress.html

The Islamic Fear of Vaginas

Scholars need to stop pretending they know everything about vaginas.

A muslims asks a scholar:

Could you explain me what is the medical benefit of girl’s circumcision?. 

And the Pedo…ahem I mean Scholar replies

Praise be to Allaah.

Just as Allaah has created mankind, He has also guided them that which is best suited to their interests in this world and in the Hereafter, so He sent them Messengers and revealed Books to guide mankind to what is good and urge them to follow it, and to teach them what is evil and warn them against it. 

Islam may enjoin or forbid something and the people – or most of them – may not be able to see the wisdom behind this command or prohibition. In that case we are obliged to obey the command or heed the prohibition and to have certain faith that the laws of Allaah are all good, even if we cannot see the wisdom behind them. 

Circumcision is one of the Sunnahs of the fitrah, as is indicated by the words of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him): "The fitrah is five things – or five things are part of the fitrah – circumcision, shaving the pubes, plucking the armpit hairs, cutting the nails, and trimming the moustache." narrated by al-Bukhaari (5889) and Muslim (257). (That’s nice but it is up to the individual and common sense.)

Undoubtedly with regard to the Sunnahs of the fitrah, some of the wisdom behind them is obvious, and that includes circumcision. There are clear benefits to it which we should pay attention to and understand the wisdom behind it. (I don’t see any.)

Circumcision is prescribed for both males and females. The correct view is that circumcision is obligatory for males and that it is one of the symbols of Islam, and that circumcision of women is mustahabb but not obligatory. ( I don’t think it should be there for woman at all as there is absolutely no benefit to female circumcision (or male in some opinions).

There are reports in the Sunnah which indicate that circumcision for women is prescribed in Islam. In Madeenah there was a woman who circumcised women and the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said to her: “Do not go to the extreme in cutting; that is better for the woman and more liked by the husband.”  Narrated by Abu Dawood (5271), classed as saheeh by Shaykh al-Albaani in Saheeh Abi Dawood. (What sort of prophet of God would prescribe a woman to maim her genitals in such a painful way? Why command her to ruin what God gave her in the first place?)

                                                                       

Female circumcision has not been prescribed for no reason, rather there is wisdom behind it and it brings many benefits. 

Mentioning some of these benefits, Dr. Haamid al-Ghawaabi says: 

The secretions of the labia minora accumulate in uncircumcised women and turn rancid, so they develop an unpleasant odour which may lead to infections of the vagina or urethra. I have seen many cases of sickness caused by the lack of circumcision. 

(Are you saying cut off the labia too? Secretions do not come from the labia but the vaginal opening and glands NEAR the labia. The secretions are self-cleaning agents and clean the vagina on their own. They are lubricants that PREVENT infections.  Only water is required to keep it clean and general cleanliness such as changing your underwear, having a shower and good grooming. Same applies to a man. This does not lead to infections at all. Infections come from bacteria being killed by taking anti-biotics, poor hygiene leading to the build-up of bad bacteria or sexually transmitted disease or when there is NO SECRETIONS FROM THE GLANDS AND THE VAGINA IS DRY. While I doubt you are a doctor for saying such a stupid thing you have probably only seen these infections because of poor health, lack of cleanliness etc. Cutting off the clitoris has nothing to do with preventing infections OR the odour. That is the secretion in the glands. Doctor my ass. Taqqiya arsehole more like it.)

Circumcision reduces excessive sensitivity of the clitoris which may cause it to increase in size to 3 centimeters when aroused, which is very annoying to the husband, especially at the time of intercourse. (Like all of God Almighty’s wonderful designs, the clitoris is supposed to increase in size so it can be stimulated so in turn the woman can have orgasm and enjoy sex. Like how penises increase in size so does the clitoris. The clitoris is a miniature penis in other words and like a penis is sensitive. DUH! So you can enjoy sex. How is it annoying to the husband? Finding the clitoris is like finding Jesus or self-enlightenment! His ego should boost a hundred fold seeing his wife melt for him! But I am being serious. It is completely normal so why should the man feel annoyed unless he is secretly gay and likes buttholes?)

Another benefit of circumcision is that it prevents stimulation of the clitoris which makes it grow large in such a manner that it causes pain. (That doesn’t happen unless you have some sort of rare disease. Again it is quite clear this “doctor’ is making up shit just to soothe his fetish for cutting off clits.)

Circumcision prevents spasms of the clitoris which are a kind of inflammation.  (Your clitoris does not ‘spasm.’ The whole woman’s body ‘spasms’ when she has an orgasm which is supposed to happen. A more common term is ‘shuddering in pleasure.)

Circumcision reduces excessive sexual desire. (Oh it is haram for a woman to feel desire now is it?)

The female gynaecologist Sitt al-Banaat Khaalid says in an article entitled Khitaan al-Banaat Ru’yah Sihhiyyah (Female circumcision from a health point of view): (NO doubt degrading herself as a woman to support her barbaric dogma)

It takes away excessive libido from women (Again why is it haram for women to feel sexual desire)

It prevents unpleasant odours which result from foul secretions beneath the prepuce. (Answered that above. Poor little clittie has nothing to do with it)

It reduces the incidence of urinary tract infections (No cleanliness and sexual responsibility does.)

It reduces the incidence of infections of the reproductive system. (The clitoris has nothing to do with infections so cutting it off will not be of any benefit but will CAUSE infections like golden staph problems)

In the book on Traditions that affect the health of women and children, which was published by the World Health Organization in 1979 it says: 

With regard to the type of female circumcision which involves removal of the prepuce of the clitoris, which is similar to male circumcision, no harmful health effects have been noted. (The updated version has changed that =) )

And Allaah knows best.

(He does which is why he said in the Quran that the human body is perfect so why are you trying to change it.)

Try this one for size: 

source: http://www.islamqa.info/en/ref/45528

Islamic Scholars Can Give Sex Tips Too!

A Muslim (in my opinion, dumb ass asks a scholar)

 I want to know whether it is correct for couples to sleep naked in the night. And how many times in 24 hours can a husband and wife have intercourse is there anything specified in Islam and medical point of view is there any restriction that it effects ones health and he /she feels tired? How to know whether wife got the orgasm after male's ejaculation because in one of your Fatwa you stated that females get orgasm in more time than males ejaculate. Is it allowed to put fingers in wife's vagina during foreplay? Please don't quote with any other Fatwa tell separately. After the birth of the child after how many days couple can have intercourse?

(First I will point out what dumb idiocy is presented here. These questions are all taught in high school and are common knowledge. Before the pedo…I mean scholar gives his enlightenment I will answer the questions.)

1.       There is nothing wrong with going all nude in the night

2.       You can have sex as much as you want in the night depending on the consent of both parties. Sex is good and it burns calories. If you want to go at it multiple times in the night then good on you.

3.       You know a woman has orgasmed because she’ll squirt or scream really loud when her climax comes and she’ll shudder. Some women will tell you as they will say “Oh God I’m gonna cum. Oh baby I’m cumming.’ If she is screaming really loud and her vagina is exceptionally wet you know an orgasm is on the way.

4.       Yes you can put your fingers up there and a lot of other things up there too ;). Perhaps you will find the G-spot. She’ll go through the roof.

5.       The quran says you cannot have sex with a woman while she is on her period. After childbirth a woman has post-natal bleeding which can last from six to eight weeks.

And the pedo…I mean scholar replies:

All perfect praise be to Allaah, The Lord of the Worlds. I testify that there is none worthy of worship except Allaah, and that Muhammad is His slave and Messenger. We ask Allaah to exalt his mention as well as that of his family and all his companions.

(If only you followed that eh?)

Spouses can sleep naked and can see nude each other as we mentioned in our Fatwa82530 and 87404. (Well Abdullah Bin Magic Carpet, sounds better than the fatwa issued by the Grand Mufti of Egypt.)

There is no limitation in enjoying one's wife. One may have sex according to his ability as long as it does not cause harm to him or his wife. We advise you to consult any trustworthy doctor in this matter.  For more information, please read Fataawa 90366and 84944. (Yes doctors are good but I am sure the karma sutra should suffice.)

One may insert his left-hand finger in his wife's vagina but it is not advisable as we mentioned in our Fatwa 87972. (There is nothing wrong with putting your fingers in her kitty no matter which hand. You need to arouse her before you stick your pipi in her gigi.)

After childbirth one can not have sex with his wife before she has completely stopped bleeding. See Fatwa 81879.

Allaah Knows best.

(Basically what I said and I am just a young university student. You do not need to go to a scholar for these things. You get this knowledge from education, friends, doctors and sex experts.)

We know you don’t worship Allah.

Source: http://www.islamweb.net/emainpage/index.php?page=showfatwa&Option=FatwaId&Id=91828

Islamic Scholars Think It is Better for Women's Vaginas to Get Cancer

A Muslim Asks a Scholar

ssalamu Alaikum wa Rathmatullahi wa Barakatu I have been told by sisters that it is not permissible for a woman to have a routine cervical smear test unless there are signs of disease showing. This is due to the fact that the test is an invasive one, needing the nurse or doctor to insert something similar to a long cotton bud in through the vagina to the cervix(womb)-(You must have failed anatomy. The cervix is not the womb.) and taking a sample. Signs of cancer in the womb , usually mean that the cancer has spread, whereas a test can detect any changes in the cells of the cervix before it becomes canerous. In my family, there is a history of cervical cancer, which puts me at risk of developing cancer

(Those sisters sounds like insecure ninnies with smelly rotting fish sticks they have the nerve to call pussies. Pap Smears are a highly encouraged obligatory part of a vaginal check-up. You don’t get a Pap Smear when you have the signs of cancer. You continuously get it done so that any signs of cancer can be dealt with before it is too late and to make sure your vagina is healthy. Leaving it unchecked when you are sexually active is very risky.)

And the pedo…ahem I mean scholar replies:

All perfect praise be to Allaah, The Lord of the Worlds. I testify that there is none worthy of worship except Allaah, and that Muhammad  is His slave and Messenger.

(Oh save it we know you don’t follow either.)

It is not permissible to expose one’s 'Awrah (parts of the body that must be covered in Islam) except in case of necessity or a dire need. Just believing that one has a disease or wanting to make sure about being safe from the disease is not a sound reason for revealing one’s 'Awrah. This prohibition is even more confirmed if the 'Awrah is the private parts. However, if a trustworthy Muslim doctor determines that there is a high possibility of being affected by the disease and there is a dire need for carrying out this periodic test, then we hope that this is permissible.

(No. It is perfectly permissible to show your vagina to a range of people. Other women, family members-as stated in the Quran, beauticians, medical personnel and of course your spouse.  It is not in cases for ‘dire need.’ The vagina needs regular check-ups to make sure it is free from infection, disease and cancer especially if one is sexually active, reaching old age or pregnant. Trustworthy Muslim Doctor? Any qualified and well respected doctor should suffice to give you this medical check-up especially if you are at high risk. Perhaps this woman should go to a female doctor instead of talking to this imbecile who clearly has no knowledge about vaginas and vaginal problems.)

In carrying out the test, the female doctor comes in priority over the male doctor, and the female Muslim doctor comes in priority over a female non-Muslim doctor. Besides, it is not permissible to show the 'Awrah more than what the necessity requires.

For more benefit, please refer to Fataawa 90424 and 84882.

(Most women do prefer a female doctor but it does not really matter. Male or female are required by law to act in a sophisticated and professional manner. A Muslim doctor takes no priority over the non-Muslim doctor. They both have the same degrees so it shouldn’t matter what religion the doctor is. Frankly in a professional environment their religions and yours is no one’s business. Showing the awrah for necessity=medical check-ups, cleanliness with beauticians, bathing with other women in public houses, spreading eagle on the bed for your spouse etc etc. Common sense.)

Finally, it should be noted that the strongest reason for the prevention from every evil or harm is relying on Allaah and earnestly asking Him for good health because it is He Who afflicts a person with diseases and it is He Who provides the cure and good health.

Allaah Knows best.

(That doesn’t mean a woman is to slack off and let her vagina become an incubus for crotch rotting diseases. Allah expects you to take care of yourself with your own effort not bore him with your pleas for him to take care of everything.)

And Allah knows best

He certainly knows that you and the questionnaire are both retards. 

Source: http://www.islamweb.net/emainpage/index.php?page=showfatwa&Option=FatwaId&Id=118326

Islamic Fatwa on Rape-Women's Testimonies Do Not Count

A muslim asks a scholar:

A 14 yr old girl has accused her father of sexually abuse since the age of 9 and also of rape. The mother of the girl says the father has admitted the abuse but not the rape. The father is now flatly denying that anything happened and says the mother has misunderstood what he said. The girl is still adamant that it all took place and by the way the man is on bail. How would this be dealt with according to Islamic law?

And the pedo…ahem I mean scholar replies:

All perfect praise be to Allaah, The Lord of the Worlds. I testify that there is none worthy of worship except Allaah, and that Muhammad is His slave and Messenger.

(Not your Allah or Prophet)

It is an abominable sin that a father sexually abuses his daughter and it is even more abominable if he rapes her. If he does so with any girl, it is strictly forbidden, let alone him doing so with his own daughter.

(Wonderful , he got the first part right)

However, it is not permissible to accuse the father of rape without evidence. Indeed, the Sharee’ah put some special conditions for proving Zina (fornication or adultery) that are not required in case of other crimes. The crime of Zina is not confirmed except if the fornicator admits it, or with the testimony of four trustworthy men, while the testimony of women is not accepted.

(Well hadither women what do you think? Your testimony is not accepted. No form of witnessing anything will help you in Sharia Law. )

Hence, the statement of this girl or the statement of her mother in itself does not Islamically prove anything against the father, especially that the latter denies it.

(In other words two women witnesses to a crime does not mean a thing even when the guilty prick denies it. In other words if you’re a hadither man and some women accuse you of a crime, all you need to do is deny it and you're off scot free.)

Therefore, if this daughter has no evidence to prove that her accusations are true, she should not have claimed that she was raped by her father and she should not have taken him to the court. But if what she says is true, then she has the right to ask for protection from him even by taking him to the court so that he would not continue committing this evil or practice more sinful acts with her. In this case, she would claim his dissoluteness and her fear of his evil so that she will be kept apart from him.

 (Obviously if she didn’t have evidence she wouldn’t be going to court ney? You don’t get to court without evidence. She also has the right to see him thoroughly punished for being an incestuous paedophile not just be apart from him. In fact he should be apart from her. Locked with up with Big Bubba in cell 36D.)

Allaah Knows best.

(You mean your satan pig God Buki is rotting in hell?)
Source: http://www.islamweb.net/emainpage/index.php?page=showfatwa&Option=FatwaId&Id=156817

The Making Of Future Terrorists

Contemporary scientists believe that the amygdala of the brain is the centre of all human emotion and behaviour. Much research has been done to unlock its secrets. Some of the experiments conducted on the amygdala included making reversible lesions on particular areas to see what emotional responses were hampered and what were more intense. Depending on where the lesion was made, emotional displays such as that of fear were gone. Similar experiments on monkeys were done and they lost fear of things from the unknown and had a more positive social behaviour.

Upon reading such things in my study of psychology it made me think that perhaps if these lowlifes in the Middle Eastern countries had lesions on their amygdalas, we would see some happy, open, tolerant and positive societies instead of the violence and perversion that is evident in them today. What I am saying here folks is that from a young age, the children of these backwards ill educated people are being and have been brainwashed to the extent that basic emotions in the amygdala are repressed and forgotten.

We have seen the sorts of abuse that goes on in Islamic Madrissa and even I witnessed it firsthand when I attended. The children are robbed of all basic things which bring them happiness such as fairytales, the singing of nursery rhymes and even tiny smiley stickers. The banning of these things that bring children much joy stem from corrupted Mullahs with their violent and cruel teachings. Their intentions are not to make peaceful law abiding Muslims, but empty shells that lack even the basic of compassionate human emotions. You can see it in their eyes when they become adults. They say the eyes are the window to the soul and when I look at these people, I don’t see a soul. Only something dark and disturbed.

What are these Mullahs creating? An army of mindless robots incapable of mercy, logic and clear thinking. As children they are robbed of their opinions, their wants and their needs. They are broken and hammered until they become these mindless robots that are theirs for the taking. They become followers for control in order for these Mullahs to gain power for whatever selfish and perverted needs they have been harbouring. Such abuse is worse in the Madrissas that are boarding schools, but in almost in every single one the story is the same.

Child beating, starvation in others, paedophilia and violent indoctrination. Good food is a privilege, privacy is a foreign concept and your own opinions, wants and needs is a no no. Such is the evil dogma of false hadiths that these corrupted Mullahs are spreading. You indoctrinate them when they are children and they become violent ruthless animals as adults. Dispatches, a show in the UK infiltrated mosques and Madrissas to see first hand the kinds of teachings children are taught.

The things shown on hidden camera were absolutely disgusting and would make a normal person shudder. Not only did we see religious teachers beating up young children, but the older children were encouraged to beat the younger ones in order to ‘make them men.’ Other teachings included discrimination and women misogyny that stemmed from mainly Pakistani ‘Mullahs.’ These sort of teachings ranged from saying a woman who won’t cover her face is ‘adulterous’ (adultery in the Quran is the actual sexual act 'what you wear makes you a whore' dogma) to ‘not smiling at’ or even acknowledging the kafir woman. For the teenage Muslim women, their teacher who studied in Saudi Arabia and follows the teachings of the extremist Wahabi, they spent their lesson discussing how to cruelly punish homosexuals.

They literally had a debate on whether to stone them to death or throw them off a high mountain based on a warped interpretation of a particular Quranic verse. Of course if you read the quran, two men guilty of sexual intercourse are to be forgiven if they repent and it only applies to Muslims. However in these Madrissas, the violent teachings of twisted Sharia Law is taught based on hadiths to turn these kids into mindless drones intent on forcing their beliefs on a society that is not theirs.

The sad thing is, is that they get away with these abominable acts even in western countries where there are laws protecting children from such abuse. Think, you see them being taught violence and oppression in Madrissas and then you see them violently protesting in the streets as adults screaming for the country that housed them to be nuked or that they will take their wives as ‘war booty’ (Again this sort of slavery rape and violence stems from hadiths). All this because some comedian drew a picture of Muhammad which is perfectly fine because he is NOT in a Muslim country and their Sharia does not apply in any sense of the word. Contemporary Quranists do not believe in such violence or such barbaric displays.

Patience is a virtue, but these transgressors do not know the meaning of the word. I am sure a peaceful protest would have worked and although there were a group of decent Muslims gently protesting on the same day, they were outshined by their more extremist counter parts. And they wonder why nobody believes Islam is peace…

But I think by now we can also see the root of the problem. We need to stop them indoctrinating their children in such a way. Like all other scripture schools including the general academic schools children attend during the day, these Madrissas need to undergo proper examination of the curriculum they teach by child rights officials as well as background checks on their teachers. They need to work with child protection agencies just like schools do and teach moderate reformed ideas or at least contemporary interpretations of their holy book. Not this primitive violent savage behaviour.

Like schools, there needs to be a place to lodge a complaint and social workers should make occasional visits to make sure everything is fine and dandy and make sure the children or not being abused in any shape or form. These people need to understand that this is the West and such teachings and acts of violence encouraged between kids is NOT acceptable.  

I sometimes only wish it was permissible to make lesions on their amygdalas and perhaps we would see some ‘normal’ human beings walking about.